Shovelhead oiling

'To the point' advice on what fits what, parts interchangeability and simple solutions to common problems...
This forum applies to Harleys.
Keep your post brief. You may include 2-3 clear cropped photos (max 600 pixels wide)...
Post Reply
RickB56
Posts: 370
Joined: Sun Jan 25, 2009 1:13 am
Location: Melbourne

Shovelhead oiling

Post by RickB56 » Tue Feb 19, 2013 7:54 pm

I have seen a guy selling split oil lines for the Shovelhead. The claim is that it resoles the issue of oil starvation on the front cylinder. I suppose this is mostly at idle. The kit is said to be brass and comes with brass push rod covers too. Not sure I care about the brass that much. Any one have any experience or thoughts to share.

TriNortchopz
Posts: 28
Joined: Sat Feb 24, 2018 5:41 pm
Location: Haines Junction,Yukon, Canada
Interests: Choppers, nature, learning more about choppers

Re: Shovelhead oiling

Post by TriNortchopz » Sun Jun 03, 2018 5:20 pm

Here is an article with a few comments/ideas:

Rocker Box Oil Line Routing – The Never-Ending Shovelhead Debate

...Specifically, the debate is over whether the stock configuration is okay (i.e. a single line from crankcase to rear rocker box, followed by a single line from rear rocker box to front rocker box) or whether a custom setup is better (i.e. splitting at the crankcase and running two lines to the front and rear rocker boxes independently). This in a nutshell is the now-dubbed, “rocker box oil line routing debate.” Shovelhead aficionados and experts fall on both sides of the argument.

The real question you should be asking is why is there even a debate in the first place? Why did someone think this rerouting of the stock lines was better than the original setup and how has it gathered such support?

The answer in three words: front-cylinder starvation. That said let’s break it down by the pros and cons of rerouting:

Pros for Rerouting

1) Oil gets to the front cylinder earlier/faster during starting (this is debatable, see below).

2) Additionally, it is possible that the oil is cooler having arrived sooner than if it had travelled through the rear rocker box first (special thanks/credit to @HarleyTales on twitter for this comment, check them out via the link)

3) The idea is to prevent early or premature front cylinder wear, including the front head gasket.

4)Advocates of this line of reasoning tout the fact that Shovelhead front head gaskets tend to wear out earlier and more often than their rear cylinder counterparts.

5) Of all of Harley’s overhead valve motors (Knucklehead, Panhead, Shovelhead, etc.), the Shovelhead was the only one which dose not have split oil lines to the rockers – make of that what you will.

Cons for Rerouting (i.e. Pros for Sticking with the Stock Routing)

1) The total re-routed line lengths are typically longer, snaking their way up to both rocker boxes after going through a split connection; any time saved (milliseconds) getting to the front cylinder is lost due to the longer run.

2) Except for immediately after a complete engine rebuild, there is always residual oil in the front rocker box to provide start-up lubrication.

3) The original lines come in flexible braided format, infinitely more resistant to the vibration of an old-school Harley-Davidson than the aftermarket re-routed, solid lines.

4) The only time the stock routing has problems is when the existing oil supply system (oil pump, etc.) is worn out or wearing out. Better to diagnose the real problem than to band-aid it with re-routed oil lines.

5) The re-routing if not precise in terms of pipe diameter could actually flood the rocker boxes.

I hope this is the best-written, most comprehensive discussion on Shovelhead rocker box oil line routing you have ever read. 🙂 If not, at least it hopefully wasn’t boring.

http://happywrench.com/2017/07/04/rocke ... e-routing/

Post Reply

Return to “Fits 'n Bits; Harley...”